0
CoachingCraft

Further Resources

Stop Being Nice and Start Getting Paid: The Brutal Truth About Client Negotiations

As told by a former people-pleaser who learnt the hard way that "being reasonable" doesn't pay the bills.

Picture this: You're sitting across from a potential client who's just spent twenty minutes explaining why your quote is "a bit steep" whilst simultaneously describing their vision for a project that's clearly worth three times what you've proposed. Sound familiar?

After fifteen years of watching talented professionals undervalue themselves because they're afraid to negotiate properly, I've developed some fairly strong opinions about how we approach client negotiations in Australia. And before you roll your eyes and think this is another "10 Tips for Better Deals" listicle, let me be clear: most of what you've been taught about negotiation is designed to keep you poor and agreeable.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Australian Business Culture

Here's something that'll ruffle some feathers: our "she'll be right" attitude is killing our profit margins. We've somehow convinced ourselves that being accommodating and flexible makes us better business people. Newsflash - it doesn't.

I learned this lesson the expensive way back in 2019 when I accepted a project at 40% below my standard rate because the client seemed "really lovely" and promised future work. Spoiler alert: the future work never materialised, and I spent six months resenting every hour I worked on that project.

The reality is that effective negotiation isn't about being aggressive or difficult. It's about understanding that every conversation is an opportunity to either increase or decrease your value in the client's eyes.

Why Most Negotiation Advice is Completely Wrong

Let me share something controversial: I actually think the whole "win-win" philosophy that gets bandied about in corporate workshops is often counterproductive.

Don't get me wrong - sustainable business relationships require mutual benefit. But when you enter every negotiation with the primary goal of making sure everyone feels good about the outcome, you're essentially volunteering to be the one who compromises first.

Real negotiation starts with the recognition that you and your client have fundamentally different objectives. They want maximum value for minimum cost. You want maximum profit for reasonable effort. These positions aren't inherently compatible, and pretending they are just leads to fuzzy thinking and weak outcomes.

The Three Pillars of Proper Client Negotiations

Pillar One: Information Asymmetry is Your Friend

Here's where most people get it backwards. They think transparency builds trust, so they share everything upfront - their costs, their timelines, their capacity, even their bloody weekend plans.

Stop it.

Information is currency in negotiations, and you're literally handing over your wallet. Smart negotiators gather intelligence while revealing as little as possible about their own position.

When a client asks, "What's your best price?" the correct response isn't to immediately slash your quote by 15%. It's to ask, "What specific outcomes are you hoping to achieve with this project?" Get them talking about their pain points, their deadlines, their budget pressures. Every piece of information they share gives you leverage.

Pillar Two: Anchoring Works (Even When You Know It's Happening)

I've sat through communication training sessions where facilitators spend hours explaining anchoring bias, yet most participants still fall victim to it in real negotiations.

The first number mentioned in any negotiation has a psychological impact on everything that follows. If your client opens with, "We were hoping to keep this under $5,000," and you were planning to quote $12,000, you've got a problem. Not because $12,000 is unreasonable, but because their anchor has already shifted the negotiation range.

Smart operators flip this script. You anchor first, and you anchor high. Not stupidly high - that just makes you look disconnected from reality. But strategically high enough that your real target price feels like a reasonable compromise.

Pillar Three: Silence is a Superpower

This one's particularly challenging for us Aussies because we've been culturally programmed to fill awkward silences with self-deprecating jokes or unnecessary explanations.

When you make an offer, shut up. When they counter, pause before responding. When they explain why your price is too high, don't immediately start justifying or defending. Just listen.

I've watched clients talk themselves into accepting higher prices simply because I didn't rush to fill the silence after they expressed concerns. People are uncomfortable with dead air, and they'll often reveal more information or make concessions just to keep the conversation moving.

The Scripts That Actually Work

Let me give you some language that's served me well over the years:

When they ask for your "best price": "I'd be happy to discuss pricing once I understand exactly what you're trying to achieve. Can you walk me through your specific requirements?"

When they say your quote is too high: "I understand price is important. What specific budget range were you working within?"

When they want to reduce scope to cut costs: "That's certainly possible. Let me show you exactly what would change in terms of outcomes if we went that route."

Notice how none of these responses immediately cave to price pressure? You're gathering information, maintaining your position, and making them do the work of explaining their constraints.

The Melbourne Café Revelation

I was grabbing coffee in South Melbourne last month when I overheard a freelance graphic designer on the phone, essentially begging a client to accept a revised quote that was 30% lower than her original proposal. She was explaining her costs, justifying her time estimates, and generally sounding like she was apologising for having the audacity to charge for her expertise.

It reminded me of something I learned from watching Harvey Specter on Suits (yes, I know it's fiction, but stick with me). Winners don't explain their prices - they explain their value.

Instead of breaking down your hourly rate and defending your profit margin, focus the conversation on what the client gets. "This investment delivers X outcome, which typically generates Y return for businesses like yours."

When to Walk Away (And Why You Probably Won't)

Here's the hardest part about effective negotiation: you have to be genuinely willing to lose the deal.

I know, I know. You've got bills to pay, a mortgage to service, and that voice in your head telling you that some money is better than no money. But clients can smell desperation from three postcodes away, and desperate people get terrible deals.

The moment you become emotionally attached to winning a particular piece of business, you've lost your negotiating power. This is why successful negotiators always have multiple opportunities in their pipeline. It's not just good business practice - it's psychological protection.

For what it's worth, I've probably walked away from more potential clients in the last five years than I worked with in my first five. And my income has more than doubled.

The Uncomfortable Maths of Saying No

Let me throw some numbers at you that might make you uncomfortable. If you typically discount your prices by 20% to win business, you need to win 25% more clients just to maintain the same revenue. But here's the kicker - those additional clients require more time, more energy, and more resources to service.

Meanwhile, if you hold firm on pricing and lose 20% of potential clients, you're actually better off financially and have more capacity to pursue higher-value opportunities.

I learned this lesson through some fairly painful trial and error. There was a period where I was working 60-hour weeks for clients who were paying bargain-basement rates, and I convinced myself I was "building relationships" and "establishing credibility."

Rubbish. I was training the market to undervalue my services.

Advanced Tactics for Serious Players

Once you've mastered the basics, there are some more sophisticated approaches worth considering.

The Decoy Effect: When presenting options, include a deliberately inferior choice that makes your preferred option look more attractive by comparison. This isn't manipulation - it's simply helping clients understand the value of what you're recommending.

Time Pressure (When Genuine): If you genuinely have limited availability, use it. "I can fit this project into my schedule if we can finalise terms by Friday. After that, we'd be looking at a March start date."

The Consultant's Paradox: Sometimes the best way to win a negotiation is to act like you don't need it. This requires genuine confidence in your abilities and alternative options, but it's incredibly effective.

What Google Taught Me About Negotiation Mindset

I had the opportunity to work with Google's Australian team a few years back, and one thing struck me about their approach to vendor negotiations. They never argued about price - they simply stated their requirements and budget parameters, then let suppliers decide whether they could deliver within those constraints.

It was refreshingly honest. No games, no emotional manipulation, just clear communication about what was available and what was expected. It made me realise how much energy we waste on theatrical negotiations when we could simply be direct about our positions.

The Integration Challenge

Learning these techniques is one thing - implementing them consistently is quite another. Most people read articles like this, nod along enthusiastically, then revert to their old patterns the moment they're sitting across from a potential client.

The key is to start small. Pick one technique and practice it in low-stakes situations until it becomes natural. I recommend starting with strategic silence - it's simple, risk-free, and immediately effective.

You might also want to consider some formal professional development training to build your confidence and skills systematically.

The Reality Check

Look, I'm not suggesting you become a heartless negotiation robot. Building genuine relationships with clients is still important for long-term success. But there's a difference between being personable and being a pushover.

The best client relationships I've developed have been with people who respected my boundaries from the beginning. When you establish clear professional parameters early, you actually create space for more authentic personal connections later.

And here's something that might surprise you: clients often prefer working with service providers who value themselves appropriately. It suggests competence, confidence, and professionalism. Nobody wants to hire someone who seems uncertain about their own worth.

Final Thoughts

Effective negotiation isn't about winning at all costs or crushing your opponents. It's about having honest conversations about value exchange whilst protecting your own interests.

If you take nothing else from this rather lengthy rant, remember this: every time you accept less than you're worth, you're not just hurting yourself - you're contributing to a market dynamic that undervalues professional services across the board.

Stop being so bloody reasonable all the time. Your business will thank you for it.

And if you're still not convinced, try implementing these approaches for just three months. Book yourself onto a negotiation workshop if you need the structured support. Track your results honestly.

I'm willing to bet you'll never go back to your old people-pleasing ways.